Logo-ipp
Submitted: 29 Jun 2023
Accepted: 17 Sep 2023
ePublished: 29 Jan 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

  Abstract View: 107

Original

Diagnostic importance of P16 in the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipomas

Pegah Hedayat 1 ORCID logo, Maryam Derakhshan 1 ORCID logo, Laya Golshani 2* ORCID logo, Arash Hedayat 3 ORCID logo

1 Department of Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
2 Pathology Medicine Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Internal Medicine Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Laya Golshani layagolshani@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Because of pathological overlaps, distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL) from lipoma is difficult.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate P16 as a differentiating marker for WDL and lipomas

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 38 pathology samples of lipoma and WDL in the department of pathology of Al-Zahra hospital, affiliated with Isfahan university of medical sciences, from 2011 to 2018. The studied samples were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to determine the presence of P16.

Results: Evaluation of IHC data showed that all of the lipoma samples (100%) had a score of 0 for IHC staining. In comparison, 84.2% of liposarcoma samples had a score of 3, and this difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of P16 gene expression showed that this marker has 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing liposarcoma (95% CI: 0.6042-0.9661).

Conclusion: The use of p16 to differentiate WDL from lipoma has a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 100%, which could be very helpful in pathological practice.

Keywords: Lipoma, Well-differentiated liposarcoma, Immunohistochemistry
Citation: Hedayat P, Derakhshan M, Golshani L, Hedayat A. Diagnostic importance of P16 in the differential diagnosis of well-differentiated liposarcoma and lipomas. Immunopathol Persa. 2024;x(x):e40558. DOI:10.34172/ ipp.2023.40558.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 108

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.